SBNR is a group I follow on Facebook, and it wil soon have a Website. An SBNR Facebook post recently pointed to a Washington Post article commenting on Anne Rice’s renunciation of Christianity. The author, Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, asks the question, “Can you leave Christianity and keep Christ? Can you be spiritual without being religious?” The answer to both questions is a resounding “yes!”
A dear friend, John Lindell, got his bachelors degree in Religion from Baylor and entered seminary. He became the pastor of a Baptist church, but came to realize that he could no longer believe the things that his church taught. He gave up his ministry. He could not preach the things that the church taught. He later reconciled the teachings of the human Jesus with the natural religion of Deism. He is one of the most spiritual people I know.
In the WaPo article the author asserts that we need ritual and sacred texts, which she calls “strength of tradition.” She asserts. She does not explain. She does go on, however, to note that the blame for many leaving organized religion is organized religion. Organized religion has not adequately dealt with sexual abuse by priests. Nor can the modern mind relate to organized religion’s condemnation of those with anything other than a strictly heterosexual orientation.
In some simplistic and intuitive leap, the author links the “spiritual, but not religious” mindset to Zen Buddhism and the “I’m OK, You’re OK” psychology of the 1960s. Why she equates the SBNR mindset to Zen Buddhism is something the author does not explain very well. Indeed, a few people I know who can be labeled SBNR do practice Zen Buddhism, but the overwhelming majority do not. The conclusion of the article is (and this is greatly understated) anticlimactic:
But until religious institutions begin to catch up and offer appealing and nutritious religious substance to these folks, this trend toward spiritual but not religious will continue. And I fear more people will go hungry.
What SBNR people will hunger for, I cannot say. The author hints at some “fiber” at the core of organized religion that is missing in people who are SBNR. Her writing, however, is so weak and her explanations so unclear, that it is difficult to understand just what her criticisms are of SBNR. All I can pick up is some sort of arrogant dismissal of SBNR for not being traditional, while at the same time, she dismisses organized religion for being too tradition-bound. I am amazed that she gets paid for this. I guess that comes along with being a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. Coherence, consistency and logic become optional. Ultimately, I felt like an outsider listening to an inside joke. I never really “got” what the author was saying, although I guess I did feel vaguely insulted by her attitude that SBNR lacks “fiber” or substance. I guess that’s what she intended, but I don’t know why.